Initial consultation and scope definition
Compliance consultation & audit
Labour Law Consultation and Compliance Audit Services
An independent assessment of your employer compliance position, with practical advice, evidence-based findings and a clear plan for follow-up.
Overview
Independent review before compliance issues become operational problems.
Sankhla’s service offering combines consultation, advisory and audit work. The engagement starts with understanding the client’s requirements, reviewing the current position and identifying areas that need correction or management attention.
Audit work is designed to produce practical observations and a structured report. Advice can include statutory interpretation, compliance trends and steps for closure.
Scope of support
What the engagement can cover.
Compliance risk assessment and document review
Audit planning and testing
Labour-law and payroll compliance review
Contractor / vendor compliance audit
Gap report and corrective-action recommendations
Follow-up review and management support
Inspection-readiness and evidence review
Scope and practical guidance
Choose advice, an audit, or a defined combination of both
Advice and evidence testing are different assignments
A consultation starts with a question: which obligation applies, how a notice should be approached, or what a proposed change means for the employer. An audit starts with records and tests whether the agreed controls were followed. A useful engagement identifies which of these outputs you need instead of treating every document review as a compliance certificate.
We separate establishment-wide review from a vendor compliance audit. Contractor testing needs a defined worker population, deployment records and supporting wage and contribution evidence. An upcoming authority visit may instead call for focused labour law audit and inspection support.
Set the scope before collecting records
Identify the legal entities, establishments, states, workforce categories and review period. The engagement should state whether it covers the entire available population or a sample, which records are outside the scope, and whether site observations are included. An unavailable document is reported as unavailable; it is not treated as proof that the underlying activity was compliant.
Useful starting records include the establishment and contractor masters, registrations, payroll and attendance summaries, statutory filings, prior findings and current notices. Personal and confidential records should be shared only through the agreed access-controlled process, not through the public enquiry form.
A report that supports a management decision
Findings should connect the requirement, evidence examined, observed gap and recommended next action. A payroll difference should identify the period and affected population; a missing registration should identify the establishment concerned. Management can then assign an owner, approve the proposed response and distinguish a completed correction from an item awaiting evidence.
An illustrative finding is a difference between deployed contractor headcount and the population in the supplied statutory working. The next step is reconciliation—not an unsupported conclusion about liability. Matters requiring interpretation or representation move into a separately scoped employer advisory engagement.
Keep review and correction responsibilities visible
The agreed output may include a scope note, evidence index, findings register and management discussion. Preparing historic returns, making statutory payments, conducting further site visits or representing the employer are separate tasks unless expressly included. An audit records the evidence and limitations at the review date; it does not guarantee that an authority will take the same view.
How we work
Structured delivery with professional review.
The exact scope depends on the establishment, location, workforce and applicable law, but the operating model remains clear.
Map the applicable compliance universe
Test records and operating practice
Escalate material gaps and exceptions
Issue findings and closure actions
Who it is for
For employers that need an independent compliance view.
Suitable for corporate offices, factories, multi-location employers, principal employers and organisations preparing for internal audit, due diligence or statutory inspection.
Corporate enquiry
Need help with consultation & audit services?
Employer questions
Labour Law Consultation and Compliance Audit Services — questions
Can we obtain advice on one issue without commissioning a full audit?
Yes. A consultation can be limited to a defined employer question and the supporting documents. An audit is more appropriate when management needs testing across a period, establishment or contractor population.
Does a clean audit remove the need for monthly compliance?
No. An audit is a review of an agreed scope and period. Routine payroll, registrations, records and filings still need their own owners and completion evidence after the review.
Will you correct every finding identified in the report?
The report and the corrective work are scoped separately. The action register should distinguish advice, employer decisions, data corrections, filing work and authority matters, with responsibilities agreed before execution.
Can an audit cover several client sites and vendors?
Yes, when the sites, vendors, period and sampling approach are identified. The report should retain site-level findings rather than give a single unsupported compliance status for the entire business.
