Compliance consultation & audit

Labour Law Consultation and Compliance Audit Services

An independent assessment of your employer compliance position, with practical advice, evidence-based findings and a clear plan for follow-up.

Employer compliance / IndiaConsultation & Audit Services
01

Overview

Independent review before compliance issues become operational problems.

Sankhla’s service offering combines consultation, advisory and audit work. The engagement starts with understanding the client’s requirements, reviewing the current position and identifying areas that need correction or management attention.

Audit work is designed to produce practical observations and a structured report. Advice can include statutory interpretation, compliance trends and steps for closure.

02

Scope of support

What the engagement can cover.

01

Initial consultation and scope definition

02

Compliance risk assessment and document review

03

Audit planning and testing

04

Labour-law and payroll compliance review

05

Contractor / vendor compliance audit

06

Gap report and corrective-action recommendations

07

Follow-up review and management support

08

Inspection-readiness and evidence review

Scope and practical guidance

Choose advice, an audit, or a defined combination of both

Advice and evidence testing are different assignments

A consultation starts with a question: which obligation applies, how a notice should be approached, or what a proposed change means for the employer. An audit starts with records and tests whether the agreed controls were followed. A useful engagement identifies which of these outputs you need instead of treating every document review as a compliance certificate.

We separate establishment-wide review from a vendor compliance audit. Contractor testing needs a defined worker population, deployment records and supporting wage and contribution evidence. An upcoming authority visit may instead call for focused labour law audit and inspection support.

Set the scope before collecting records

Identify the legal entities, establishments, states, workforce categories and review period. The engagement should state whether it covers the entire available population or a sample, which records are outside the scope, and whether site observations are included. An unavailable document is reported as unavailable; it is not treated as proof that the underlying activity was compliant.

Useful starting records include the establishment and contractor masters, registrations, payroll and attendance summaries, statutory filings, prior findings and current notices. Personal and confidential records should be shared only through the agreed access-controlled process, not through the public enquiry form.

A report that supports a management decision

Findings should connect the requirement, evidence examined, observed gap and recommended next action. A payroll difference should identify the period and affected population; a missing registration should identify the establishment concerned. Management can then assign an owner, approve the proposed response and distinguish a completed correction from an item awaiting evidence.

An illustrative finding is a difference between deployed contractor headcount and the population in the supplied statutory working. The next step is reconciliation—not an unsupported conclusion about liability. Matters requiring interpretation or representation move into a separately scoped employer advisory engagement.

Keep review and correction responsibilities visible

The agreed output may include a scope note, evidence index, findings register and management discussion. Preparing historic returns, making statutory payments, conducting further site visits or representing the employer are separate tasks unless expressly included. An audit records the evidence and limitations at the review date; it does not guarantee that an authority will take the same view.

How we work

Structured delivery with professional review.

The exact scope depends on the establishment, location, workforce and applicable law, but the operating model remains clear.

01

Map the applicable compliance universe

02

Test records and operating practice

03

Escalate material gaps and exceptions

04

Issue findings and closure actions

03

Who it is for

For employers that need an independent compliance view.

Suitable for corporate offices, factories, multi-location employers, principal employers and organisations preparing for internal audit, due diligence or statutory inspection.

Corporate enquiry

Need help with consultation & audit services?

Get assessment

Employer questions

Labour Law Consultation and Compliance Audit Services — questions

Can we obtain advice on one issue without commissioning a full audit?

Yes. A consultation can be limited to a defined employer question and the supporting documents. An audit is more appropriate when management needs testing across a period, establishment or contractor population.

Does a clean audit remove the need for monthly compliance?

No. An audit is a review of an agreed scope and period. Routine payroll, registrations, records and filings still need their own owners and completion evidence after the review.

Will you correct every finding identified in the report?

The report and the corrective work are scoped separately. The action register should distinguish advice, employer decisions, data corrections, filing work and authority matters, with responsibilities agreed before execution.

Can an audit cover several client sites and vendors?

Yes, when the sites, vendors, period and sampling approach are identified. The report should retain site-level findings rather than give a single unsupported compliance status for the entire business.

↑