M.S. Sankhla
MPM, LL.B & DLL · Founder & CEO
Founder and CEO of Sankhla Corporate Services Private Limited. His background includes senior HR experience in Indian industry before establishing the labour-law compliance practice.
Our core team
Sankhla Consultants combines operating experience with specialist backgrounds in labour law, government labour administration, provident fund and financial advisory.
MPM, LL.B & DLL · Founder & CEO
Founder and CEO of Sankhla Corporate Services Private Limited. His background includes senior HR experience in Indian industry before establishing the labour-law compliance practice.
Dy. Labour Commissioner (Retd.)
Retired from the Labour Department, Ministry of Labour & Employment, Government of India, with more than three decades of service experience in labour administration.
Assistant PF Commissioner (Retd.)
Retired from the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation after more than three decades of service, bringing specialist experience in provident-fund administration.
Chartered Accountant and IP
Chartered accountant with experience working with Fortune 500 companies, MNCs, Indian business houses and professional law and accounting firms.
How expertise is used
The strongest compliance model separates recurring process from matters that need interpretation, regulator experience or professional judgment.
Recurring compliance delivery
Payroll and statutory verification
Inspection and notice support
Advisory and escalation
Scope and practical guidance
The Payroll workstream supports payroll preparation and independent verification and routine EPF and ESIC operations. It works from approved employee and attendance inputs, documents differences and coordinates the relevant correction and approval trail. A filing or payment task is performed only within the agreed scope and authorisation.
Questions requiring legal interpretation, a notice reply or authority liaison move to Legal Compliance. This makes the escalation route explicit without mixing a contested matter with routine monthly processing.
Legal Compliance covers employer advisory and notices, authority liaison and vendor or client compliance audits. Audits identify the evidence reviewed, gaps found and follow-up required; they are not continuous site supervision or a guarantee of a regulatory outcome.
The specialist backgrounds described above provide context for professional review. The actual engagement identifies the responsible contacts and mandate. A past government role does not imply current government affiliation, influence or preferential treatment.
The statutory-compliance workstream connects registers and records, returns and PT/LWF coordination with the approved payroll and establishment inputs. Client communication should identify what has been received, what remains pending and which decision or document is needed next.
The employer retains its approval and payment responsibilities. Technical safety, engineering and other specialist certifications are not replaced by a payroll or documentary-compliance review. The company profile explains the wider delivery approach and the company page describes the practice.