Notifications · Haryana
Haryana Employees’ Compensation: Directions on Considering Penalty
Haryana’s Labour Commissioner has directed the relevant Commissioners to consider section 4A(3)(b) of the Employees’ Compensation Act in every applicable case. The claimant’s failure to expressly ask for penalty is not, by itself, a reason to omit that consideration.
- Jurisdiction
- Haryana
- Issued on
- 07 October 2026
- Status
- Published
- Reference
- 26052–90
State-wise library
Check another state or UT
Move directly to the published notifications records for a jurisdiction.
Official circular
Reference details
Use the official reference, date, jurisdiction and effective period below before implementation.
| Reference number | 26052–90 |
|---|---|
| Issue date | 07 Oct 2026 |
| Jurisdiction | Haryana |
| Issuing authority | Labour Commissioner, Haryana |
| Subject | Notice / Circular |
| Status | Published |
Circular summary
What the circular says
Haryana’s Labour Commissioner has directed the relevant Commissioners to consider section 4A(3)(b) of the Employees’ Compensation Act in every applicable case. The claimant’s failure to expressly ask for penalty is not, by itself, a reason to omit that consideration.
Document and dates
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Authority | Labour Commissioner, Haryana |
| Document number | 26052–90 |
| Direction date | 7 October 2026 |
| Addressees | Deputy and Assistant Labour Commissioners exercising compensation-Commissioner powers |
| Case scope | Pending and future cases, to the extent applicable in law |
Who should review this update?
Employers involved in applicable employee-compensation proceedings in Haryana should ensure that the record addresses the payment history and relevant statutory issues. The direction is addressed to Commissioners and does not decide the facts or penalty outcome of an individual dispute.
What the document says
- The direction concerns strict compliance with section 4A(3)(b) of the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923.
- An absence of an express penalty prayer does not, by itself, justify leaving the statutory penalty question unexamined.
- The direction covers pending and future cases to the extent applicable in accordance with law.
Practical employer steps
Use the following review steps to apply the document to the establishment and the relevant period.
- Review pending compensation matters for complete records of the incident, liability correspondence, payments and any delay explanation.
- Ensure the person handling the case considers the penalty question where relevant instead of relying only on the wording of the claimant’s prayer.
- Track notices and responses and preserve the evidence submitted to the Commissioner.
- Keep the administrative direction distinct from a case-specific order when communicating possible exposure internally.
Frequently asked questions
Does the circular impose a penalty automatically in every case?
It directs consideration of the statutory provision in applicable cases. It does not itself determine an individual case or impose a fixed penalty.
Can the issue be ignored because the claimant did not ask for penalty?
The direction says that omission is not, by itself, a reason to omit consideration of the provision.
Does it concern only new claims?
The text addresses pending and future cases, subject to applicability in law.
Source and related guidance
Read the original government document (third-party mirror) (Sankhla-hosted PDF).
The linked file reproduces the original government document; its hosting website is an independent document mirror.
Related compliance references
Official circular / document
Open the controlling government source.
Haryana Employees’ Compensation: Directions on Considering Penalty · Labour Commissioner, Haryana
Get compliance updates by email
Choose your states, topics and frequency for gazettes, notifications, minimum wages and new articles. Change your preferences or unsubscribe anytime.
